Monica Lu
Dio Antonio
Joshua Nham
Andrew Lee
Mikee Ronquillo
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Upcycling project
My upcycling design is a chair made from various materials that are both recyclable and non-recyclable. Milk crates, metal chair frame, self adhesive foam, sample vinyl tiles and PVC coated wiring (computer wires). However my design did not initially begin with the idea of a chair, like most designers and design processes the initial design ends up almost nothing like the final. In my case, it began as a hot water bottle jacket which was denied through helpful feedback. Using the feedback I had received from my tutor I took a more industrial approach and found that the chair is almost iconic in the world of industrial design from Charles and Ray Eames to Marc Newson. Obviously I did not expect my chair to be on the same level as world renown designers, merely inspired by. The materials I chose fell under the category of upcycling as such: Milk crates are often stolen and taken from grocers, shops and markets all the time which are usually disfigured or used for personal reasons which end up being discarded and in the landfill. Metal chair frames are just discarded chairs left for the council to pick up and melt down to form new metal, but the process in doing so is costly, possibly harmful to the environment and time consuming. Refurbishing a worn out chair is much more cost effective as well as safe for the environment. Self adhesive foam has a type of glue attached to it that is not only poisonous but prevents the foam to be recycled properly. Sample vinyl tiles are just offcuts that are used to display colour and texture of vinyl tiles at flooring departments but are discarded when not needed anymore. PVC coated wiring is an obvious ‘non-recyclable’ because PVC is poisonous when burnt so it can only be discarded into the landfill.
My chair features a pattern on the seat that resembles a decorative tile in the front or backyard of a house. Created with the sample vinyl tiles cut and pasted onto the bottom of the milk crate piece. I slotted pieces of self adhesive foam into the squares of the milk crate piece to create the image of a decorative tile that represents where and what the chair would be used for. The black chair frame against the white milk crate pieces enhances the seat and focuses the attention onto the coloured tiles and decorative patterns of the seat which becomes pleasing aesthetically.
Monday, October 11, 2010
Philippe Starck: Design for Life.
Mankind, ethicality, sustainability and ecology. What do these words mean to you? To Philippe Starck these are the elements of a successful design. In the television series "Design for Life" twelve young and ambitious designers compete for work experience with Philippe Starck himself at his agency in Paris.
For me, the main focus of this series was not the aspiring designers and their attempts to impress Starck. What caught my attention and started to make me think was; what goes on in Starck's mind and how he is able to design such influential and successful products. This is shown through the tasks he sets for the designers and how he responds to their said tasks. As previously mentioned ethicality, sustainability, ecology and beneficial to mankind are elements that he believes creates good design and expects the competitors to share his vision. This showed me that many factors must be taken into thought as a new design is to be created, through the process of designing a new product many things may change the course and outcome thus designers needing feedback. As Philippe Starck critiques the designs of the contestants, his harsh and seemingly cold responses seem not to phase the designers. I questioned this myself but came to the conclusion that when it comes to life and reality, there will never be sugar-coating in a real design firm. Watching how Starck reacts to designs and his comments has impacted me in a way that when I design future products I, myself will ask the same questions and critique in a similar manner to improve.
Another thing that was brought up in the series was that Starck's designs were unconventional and non-functional. That stumped me when I first noticed it, shouldn't good design do what it was meant to be designed for in a manner that would be appreciated and comfortable? Starck's philosophy is quite simple really; Simplicity and Necessity. He designs for what is needed in the world today and not of design trends that are in and out of season. I believe that his philosophy is almost perfect and just what we need in society these days. Simplicity and necessity in design that is not affected by trends of marketing. However, I still do not agree with the OPTION of the design to be functional or not, I stand by the idea of all good design must be functional in a way it was designed for.
Watching Starck and his 'tribe' trial the contestants has shown me how a successful designer thinks and feels towards design which has allowed me to adjust my vision of design and how good design is created. Starck is an amazing designer and I would definitely love to just sit down and pick his brains a little more in order to gain more insight into the design world but for now, the videos have sparked an interest in his work and will lead me into discovering more about Philippe Starck and design for life.
For me, the main focus of this series was not the aspiring designers and their attempts to impress Starck. What caught my attention and started to make me think was; what goes on in Starck's mind and how he is able to design such influential and successful products. This is shown through the tasks he sets for the designers and how he responds to their said tasks. As previously mentioned ethicality, sustainability, ecology and beneficial to mankind are elements that he believes creates good design and expects the competitors to share his vision. This showed me that many factors must be taken into thought as a new design is to be created, through the process of designing a new product many things may change the course and outcome thus designers needing feedback. As Philippe Starck critiques the designs of the contestants, his harsh and seemingly cold responses seem not to phase the designers. I questioned this myself but came to the conclusion that when it comes to life and reality, there will never be sugar-coating in a real design firm. Watching how Starck reacts to designs and his comments has impacted me in a way that when I design future products I, myself will ask the same questions and critique in a similar manner to improve.
Another thing that was brought up in the series was that Starck's designs were unconventional and non-functional. That stumped me when I first noticed it, shouldn't good design do what it was meant to be designed for in a manner that would be appreciated and comfortable? Starck's philosophy is quite simple really; Simplicity and Necessity. He designs for what is needed in the world today and not of design trends that are in and out of season. I believe that his philosophy is almost perfect and just what we need in society these days. Simplicity and necessity in design that is not affected by trends of marketing. However, I still do not agree with the OPTION of the design to be functional or not, I stand by the idea of all good design must be functional in a way it was designed for.
Watching Starck and his 'tribe' trial the contestants has shown me how a successful designer thinks and feels towards design which has allowed me to adjust my vision of design and how good design is created. Starck is an amazing designer and I would definitely love to just sit down and pick his brains a little more in order to gain more insight into the design world but for now, the videos have sparked an interest in his work and will lead me into discovering more about Philippe Starck and design for life.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)